
No-code integration platform for rich bi-directional sync

Zero downtime migration to tool of your choice

Keep Historical Data, Without Slowing Down Your Tools

Migrate or restructure Azure DevOps

Real-time, context-rich data lake for AI or analytics
By Role
Accelerate delivery with clear insights

Accelerate delivery with clear insights

Transform smarter with a connected digital thread

Confident transitions for every enterprise change
By Initiative

Modernize and move to cloud without disruption

Build a compliant digital thread for complex environments

Build the foundation for smarter AI
By Domain

No-code integration across teams and systems

Enable collaboration between IT, support, and business teams

Connect PLM & engineering teams for smarter products

Ensure regulatory compliance from start to release

Explore the latest in technology best practices

Success stories from the field

Actionable insights for your business challenges.

See solutions in action

Learn, plan, and execute with confidence

Official announcements and updates

Join discussions that drive results

Stay ahead with curated insights

See side by side comparison
share this post:
A practical guide to preserving traceability, history, and continuity during ALM migration
For most QA and engineering teams, migrating from OpenText ALM to OpenText ALM Octane sounds straightforward on paper. Move your data. Switch systems. Move o
Break one link, and the problem is not technical. It is operational.
Now imagine this during a release review or an audit.
The system has data.
But it cannot answer questions.
That is when teams stop trusting it.
This is why traceability across requirements, defects, tests, and test runs is not just important. It is what makes the system usable in the first place.
And this is where most migrations fall short.
Not because records are missing.
But because the story connecting them is gone.
A successful migration is not about moving records. It is about preserving context.
Here is what that includes:
Without these, teams are forced to reconstruct knowledge manually.
One important thing to understand is that ALM and Octane do not follow identical structures. This means migration is not just copying data. It involves transformation.
For example:
| In OpenText ALM | In OpenText ALM Octane |
|---|---|
| Defects | Requirements and requirement documents |
| Requirements | Defects |
| Tests | Epics, features, and user stories |
| Test sets and configurations | Tasks and quality stories |
| Test runs | Test suites and manual tests |
| Cycles and releases | Gherkin tests |
| Execution requests | Runs, milestones, and sprints |
At this point, the challenge is not understanding what needs to be preserved.
It is figuring out how to do it without slowing teams down or introducing risk.
This is where a migration tool like OpsHub Migration Manager (OMM) typically fits in. What makes OMM different is its ability to enable zero-downtime migration, enabling teams to work in both systems simultaneously while ensuring the final state remains fully consistent.
Not as a replacement for your systems, but as a controlled way to move data between them while preserving relationships, history, and structure.
Instead of treating migration as a one-time transfer, it enables teams to:
The focus shifts from “moving data quickly” to “moving data safely, with context intact.”
Let’s see how OpsHub Migration Manager migrates OpenText ALM to ALM Octane:
Set up connections to both source and target systems by providing:
Validate the connections to ensure OMM can:
Select the specific domain and project in OpenText ALM and the corresponding workspace/project in OpenText ALM Octane.
Define the migration scope by specifying:
This step ensures that only the required data is migrated and mapped to the correct location in the target system.
This is one of the most important steps because it determines how data will appear in the new system. OMM enables customized mapping between differently named or structured fields across systems, ensuring semantic consistency even when schemas do not match.
One of the biggest risks in migration is disruption.
Stopping work for migration is rarely acceptable in modern teams.
“OpsHub Migration Manager is designed to support this by enabling:
The datasheet highlights the importance of enabling teams to continue using both systems during the transition and avoid downtime.
This approach reduces risk and gives teams confidence and turns migration from a risky one-time event into a controlled, transparent process.
Even well-planned migrations can fail due to common pitfalls:
When done right, your new system should feel complete from day one.
Teams should be able to:
In short, nothing important should be felt missing.
Request a free demo if see how OMM facilitates a zero downtime Micro Focus ALM to ALM Octane migration
Migrating from OpenText ALM to OpenText ALM Octane is not just a technical transition.
It is a shift in how teams manage quality, collaboration, and delivery. But the real value lies in preserving what you have already built. Data alone is not enough. Context is what makes it useful. If you can move both together, your migration does not just succeed. It sets you up for better, faster, and more confident delivery going forward.
If you are planning an OpenText ALM to ALM Octane migration, it helps to get clarity early before things get complex.
If you are still evaluating your migration approach, it is worth talking to our migration engineers to understand how zero-downtime, parallel migration can work in your environment and to learn how OMM fits in your migration journey.
Or, if you prefer to start with your own setup:
Because the success of migration is rarely decided during execution. It is decided in how well you prepare for what cannot break.
Have more questions about your use case?
See how OpsHub looks like in your environment





































